Welcome back, everyone! Just a quick update before I get to this wonderful interview. This will probably be my last post before the Fierce Reads event in October. I'm glad I got to get in one big set of posts before I deliver, because these authors are amazing and deserve every bit of promotion they get. I hope you'll love STRANGER as much as I did! Without further ado...
Goodreads Book Description:
Many generations ago, a mysterious cataclysm struck the world. Governments collapsed and people scattered, to rebuild where they could. A mutation, "the Change,” arose, granting some people unique powers. Though the area once called Los Angeles retains its cultural diversity, its technological marvels have faded into legend. "Las Anclas" now resembles a Wild West frontier town… where the Sheriff possesses superhuman strength, the doctor can warp time to heal his patients, and the distant ruins of an ancient city bristle with deadly crystalline trees that take their jewel-like colors from the clothes of the people they killed.
Teenage prospector Ross Juarez’s best find ever – an ancient book he doesn’t know how to read – nearly costs him his life when a bounty hunter is set on him to kill him and steal the book. Ross barely makes it to Las Anclas, bringing with him a precious artifact, a power no one has ever had before, and a whole lot of trouble.
Stranger stands on its own, but there will be three more books in the series: Hostage, Rebel, and Traitor.
Goodreads Book Description:
Many generations ago, a mysterious cataclysm struck the world. Governments collapsed and people scattered, to rebuild where they could. A mutation, "the Change,” arose, granting some people unique powers. Though the area once called Los Angeles retains its cultural diversity, its technological marvels have faded into legend. "Las Anclas" now resembles a Wild West frontier town… where the Sheriff possesses superhuman strength, the doctor can warp time to heal his patients, and the distant ruins of an ancient city bristle with deadly crystalline trees that take their jewel-like colors from the clothes of the people they killed.
Teenage prospector Ross Juarez’s best find ever – an ancient book he doesn’t know how to read – nearly costs him his life when a bounty hunter is set on him to kill him and steal the book. Ross barely makes it to Las Anclas, bringing with him a precious artifact, a power no one has ever had before, and a whole lot of trouble.
Stranger stands on its own, but there will be three more books in the series: Hostage, Rebel, and Traitor.
About Sherwood Smith: Sherwood Smith began her
publishing career in 1986, writing mostly for young adults and children.
Sherwood Smith studied in Austria for a year, earning a masters in history. She
worked many jobs, from bar tender to the film industry, then turned to teaching
for twenty years, working with children from second grade to high school. She specialized in literature, history, and
drama. To date she’s published over
forty books, nominated for several awards, including the Nebula, the Mythopoeic
Fantasy Award, and an Anne Lindbergh Honor Book.
Sherwood blogs at LiveJournal (http://sartorias.livejournal.com) and Book View Café (http://bookviewcafe.com/blog/author/sherwood/). She has a Facebook account but only visits it two or three times a year, and does not do Twitter.
Sherwood blogs at LiveJournal (http://sartorias.livejournal.com) and Book View Café (http://bookviewcafe.com/blog/author/sherwood/). She has a Facebook account but only visits it two or three times a year, and does not do Twitter.
About Rachel Manija
Brown: Rachel Manija Brown is the author of Stranger, a
post-apocalyptic YA novel co-written with Sherwood Smith, the collection A
Cup of Smoke, and the memoir All the Fishes Come Home to Roost: An
American Misfit in India. She wrote the graphic novels The Nine-Lives
and Spy Goddess for Tokyopop. She has also written television, short
stories, plays, video games, and poetry.
In her other identity, she is a trauma/PTSD therapist.
Rachel blogs at LiveJournal (http://rachelmanija.livejournal.com). She rarely visits Facebook or Twitter.
Rachel blogs at LiveJournal (http://rachelmanija.livejournal.com). She rarely visits Facebook or Twitter.
Author Duo Interview
1. It's not often
that I get an author duo on my blog. Can you tell us about how you guys met,
figured out you wanted to write together, and a little about the process of
co-writing a book?
Sherwood and
Rachel: We first met online, back when there were only one or two
social media venues, so pretty much all the science fiction and fantasy world
was interacting with each other.
Rachel was working in Hollywood, and had been at the Jim Henson Company
for a number of years, so the company contacted her with an interesting offer.
They wanted her to create a TV series in partnership with a children’s book
author who met the following criteria: the writer had to live in or near L.A.,
had to be well respected in the field, and had to be someone Rachel thought she
could work with, but couldn’t be so hugely successful and famous that the Jim
Henson Company couldn’t afford them.
Rachel immediately thought of Sherwood, and e-mailed her to ask
if she would be interested. Unbeknownst to Rachel, Sherwood had also worked in
Hollywood. So they met for the first time and started creating a TV series. The
series didn’t sell, but the Jim Henson executives loved it, and gave them a
standing offer to come in and pitch anything any time. Sherwood and Rachel found
that they enjoyed working together, and it was a very good offer, so they
created a new series: The Change.
That series didn’t sell either, so they turned it into a novel, taking
advantage of all the things you can do in a novel that you can’t afford to
do—or are not allowed to do—on TV.
Sherwood: Our process is
completely different than the processes of any of my other collaborations.
Rachel: The way we work is
unusual in the book world, but more common in television, where writers will
sit together in a room and create first the story of a script in discussion,
then write it by speaking the dialogue. Sherwood and I sit down and discuss the
plot of the entire story, taking notes.
Before we write a chapter, we discuss what will happen in more
detail. Then we sit side by side at a computer and write the chapter, usually
Sherwood typing but either of us providing text. The result is a book where any
given sentence was probably written by both of us together. When we have a
first draft, we pass it back and forth for rewrites and polishes and additions.
2. You have a
whopping 5 POVs in your book, and all of these characters are really
interesting. Do you each have a favorite or one you love to write? Do each of
you write each character or do each of you write certain characters?
Sherwood and
Rachel: We had to laugh at that “whopping 5 POVs.” This is a common
reaction to our book, but the idea that a “normal” book would only have one or
two POVs is a very recent one. Up until the mid-twentieth century, POVs were
usually some form of omniscient, which meant that the narrative voice could
slide in and out of everybody’s mind as needed for the story. Lord of the Rings is written in
omniscient. For two sentences, we get the POV of a fox watching the hobbits head
toward Bree.
We chose not to write this book in omni POV, in favor of third
person limited. But we felt that this was a story about community, not about
the more modern-standard lone individual. To convey that, we needed multiple
points of view.
Sherwood: As for characters,
I don’t have a favorite to write, but for some reason I get a real kick out of
reading Mia’s POV after we’ve done the chapter. Her cluelessness reminds me so
much of myself, though I was also clueless about science as a teen!
Rachel: I don’t have a
favorite to write overall, but my favorite person to write dialogue for is Mia.
I love her jittery stream of consciousness way of speaking.
3. I love how you
write about all relationships, including LGBT relationships and even a threesome
as mainstream in your book. What made you guys decide to do this, and do you
expect (or have you already received) backlash?
Sherwood and
Rachel: To dispose of the backlash first, we did receive objections for
writing a major sympathetic gay character when searching for an agent. However,
that is such a long story that we don’t want to recap it here. Here’s the gist
of it: http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/genreville/?p=1519
We have gay/lesbian/bisexual teenagers in our books because we
know a lot of them in real life. Why shouldn’t they get to read about heroes
like themselves?
The reason for the Mia/Ross/Jennie relationship was that we were
tired of predictable love triangles in YA novels. In many of them, it would
have made more sense for the characters to simply discuss the situation and
work out a solution that made emotional sense, rather than lying and cheating
and angsting for 300 pages. We felt that Mia and Jennie were so close that they
would have talked about their feelings, rather than ending their friendship
over their attraction to some guy. The resolution they come up with was one
that we felt made sense for the characters.
Also, in real life, people’s relationships don’t necessarily fit
into neat little boxes of one heterosexual woman plus one heterosexual man at a
time, and neither of us felt that the implication that they should is
emotionally honest.
4. Name some of
your favorite authors/books.
Sherwood: I have so many
favorites that it would take too long to list them all! Here are a few.
Books that influenced me as a kid: Enid Blyton’s “Adventure”
series, where I finally found girls who got to adventure as well as boys. Mara, Daughter of the Nile, by Eloise
Jarvis McGraw sparked a love of history and other cultures. Lord of the Rings, which validated my
love of writing fantasy at a time when fantasy was disapproved of.
Shifting to modern times, there are so many wonderful writers
these days! I’ll mention some books I loved that don’t have publicity pushes
from big publishers: Pen Pal, by
Francesca Forrest, which is kind of YA and kind of not, about a pen friendship
between a girl and a woman, both from cultures under stress. It’s such a
wonderful book. Then, for sheer fun, Australian writer Andrea K. Höst’s series
beginning with Stray, a high school
girl who suddenly finds herself in another world. She has to cope, though she
assumes she is perfectly ordinary . . . but somehow the change of world changes
her. Delightful, exciting, and romantic!
Rachel: I have too many
favorites to list, so I’ll just recommend some books that you might not already
know about.
The Rifter, by Ginn Hale, is
an intricate and epic portal fantasy that’s full of surprises— one of the most
engrossing and well-constructed fantasies I’ve read in years. The beginning is
a little weak (and also darker than the book is overall), but it picks up
quickly and keeps getting better and better. On a completely different note, Prater Violet, by Christopher Isherwood,
is a novella about the relationship between an American screenwriter and a
Jewish European director, who are thrown together on the eve of WWII to make a
fluffy musical comedy. It packs a tremendous amount of comedy, atmosphere, and
emotional weight into a very short space. (Spoiler: Nobody dies in the
Holocaust.) I also second Sherwood’s recommendation for Pen Pal. It’s a unique, atmospheric, moving novel.
5. Rachel, this
book is completely different from your first book, and Sherwood, while this is
closer to what you've already written, it's also different. Can you guys talk
about branching out and why you decided to write a YA book?
Sherwood: I don’t really
decide what I’m going to write. Being an intensely visual person, I always
begin with the image. Then I try to figure out whose story it is, and why they
are telling it. The category (fantasy? Non-fantasy? YA? Middle grade? For all
readers?) comes last.
Rachel: I’ve written in a
whole lot of genres, so this didn’t feel like branching out to me. I’m always
branching out.
6. Which Hogwarts
house would you be in and why?
Rachel: When I lived in
India, I briefly attended a military school that had a house system similar to
the Hogwarts houses. The houses weren’t based on characteristics, but simply
divided the students into four groups named after major Indian rivers. It was
intended to foster friendly competition among the students, not unhealthy
rivalry, and so every year the students switched houses. So to me, the house
system brings back fond memories of being passionately attached to my house of
the year.
On that note, I think I would be in Gryffindor. I think of the
Hogwarts house characteristics not as exclusionary—Hermione is obviously
intelligent enough to be in Ravenclaw—but is tapping into the most basic and
essential facet of the self. For me, courage is more of an essential
characteristic than intelligence, loyalty, or sneakiness.
Sherwood: When I was a
teacher, I loved the students’ enthusiasm for the Harry Potter books, and of
course I read each as it came out. But I was reading as a post-fifty-something
Baby Boomer, who was a product of overcrowded schools and the late fifties-and
early sixties hardline emphasis on conformity. So while my students compared
the houses and imagined themselves in this one or that one, I nodded and smiled,
but I secretly thought that if I’d read the books as a kid, I would have been
leading a revolution against the house system altogether!
7. Can you give a
few words of advice to aspiring writers?
Sherwood: Read, read, read. Read as widely as you can, about
everything. Observe real people doing
real things, and try not to get ideas on behavior from TV and movies because
the actors are following a script. They know what’s coming next, which in real
life we don’t, and they are moving according to direction. A writer needs to
try to understand the world before she can reflect it—and maybe even change it.
Rachel: 1. Don’t worry
about breaking the rules. There are no rules. Write what you want to read. 2.
Don’t worry about making the first draft perfect. Just get the story down, even
if it’s terrible. You can fix it later. Trying to get every bit perfect or even
good the first time is a recipe for never finishing anything.
8. Can you let us
know a little of what we have in store next for the characters in Stranger in the sequel? Do you plan for
this to be a duology, trilogy, or longer?
Sherwood and
Rachel: It’s a four book series.
Ross, Mia, and Jennie have POVs in all four books, but the other POVs rotate,
with a new POV character in each book.
The sequel to Stranger
is Hostage. Ross is kidnapped and
dragged to Gold Point, King Voske’s city. Voske’s teenage daughter Kerry is the
new POV character. While his friends in Las Anclas desperately try to rescue
him, Ross is forced to engage in a battle of wills with the king himself. And
he’s not the only hostage . . .
In book three, Rebel,
Ross’s past comes back to haunt him, while Las Anclas battles mysterious fires.
The new POV character is someone you first met in Stranger, but probably not someone you would expect to get a POV. And
that’s just one of many surprises.
Book four is Voske Strikes
Back—er, no, it’s actually Traitor.
Everybody you’ve been wondering about returns, all with important parts to play
in a battle for Las Anclas’s very survival. The new POV character in this book
is someone whose perspective you may have been waiting for.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm dying to get my hands on the next book!
Don't forget to enter into this great giveaway to either win their book (US/Can) or a bunch of great swag that I got from many authors at the last event I went to (INT)!
a Rafflecopter giveaway
Very interesting interview - I've 'known' Sherwood through LJ for years now, am a fan of her books, so enjoyed some new insight into her writing. And Rachel too is fascinating - thanks for the link regarding your gay character and I am so glad you both stuck to your guns on that issue. I've preordered the book, and wish it were here RIGHT NOW. :)
ReplyDeleteLoved the interview. It's especially interesting to see how script writing has changed they way you write together.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the interview! It was great to get to know Sherwood Smith better, and find out about Rachel Brown. The book sounds really exciting. I'd love to win a copy!
ReplyDeleteThe 5 POVs are kind of tricky. I don't usually like books that have more than 2 POVs, because I always seem to lose focus on each character. But, I trust your review and I am going to go for it. Also, I love authors who aren't afraid to put their creativeness inside of books, especially when faced with LGBT scenarios. Cudos to these two authors!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed learning more about how you co-wrote this book. Every writer has her own style of writing and I know from my own collaborative projects it can be difficult to mesh different styles so the style, narration, and voice seems to be from one writer.
ReplyDelete